WEATHER AUTHORITY : Heat Advisory View Alerts

Romney's astonishing nonsense about Amash and Mueller

Article Image

Rep. Justin Amash (R-MI), the first Republican congressman to accuse President Trump of "impeachable conduct," shared why he will not be deterred by the president or House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy.

Posted: May 22, 2019 8:40 AM
Updated: May 22, 2019 8:40 AM

An astonishing thing happened on Saturday. US Rep. Justin Amash, R-Michigan, read the redacted Mueller Report and concluded from the evidence that President Donald Trump committed impeachable offenses, and broke ranks with his party. In a concise tweet, Amash -- a tea party Republican -- announced to the world: "President Trump has engaged in impeachable conduct."

The furious backlash from his fellow Republicans began immediately. Trump himself even took to Twitter to call Amash a "total lightweight."

Some may have been surprised to see Sen. Mitt Romney -- the Utah Republican who is a former presidential candidate and occasional Trump antagonist -- get into the act. On Jake Tapper's "State of the Union" Sunday, he said he too read the Mueller Report and "reached a different conclusion:" that the report does not establish that Trump obstructed justice.

What method of legal analysis could Romney possibly be using?

I ask this rhetorically, and tweeted about it last weekend (this essay is adapted from that thread), because the method of legal analysis used in the Mueller Report is known as IRAC, a method widely known to lawyers and law students. Mitt Romney, by the way, has a law degree from Harvard.

IRAC stands for Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion. No surprise: the Mueller Report uses the IRAC method elegantly and beautifully; the analysis is done for us. All we have to do is read it. We can then decide for ourselves who is correct, Rep. Amash or Sen. Romney.

The "issue" part of IRAC would be phrased as a question: Did Trump commit obstruction of justice?

Next comes the "rule" which means listing the elements of the crime. The elements of obstruction of justice, says the Mueller Report, are:

1. An "obstructive act";

2. A nexus between the obstructive act and an official proceeding; and

3. A corrupt intent.

Next, we look to see if we have enough facts to support each element. This is the "analysis" part of IRAC.

To achieve a conviction, a prosecutor must have enough evidence to prove each element beyond a reasonable doubt. To keep this simple, let's focus on the facts given in Volume II, pages 113-120 of the Mueller Report.

The facts we find there are easily summarized:

• In June of 2017, Trump ordered former White House Counsel Don McGahn to fire Mueller;

• McGahn refused;

• In January of 2018, the New York Times reported the story;

• Trump, through his personal lawyer and two aides, "sought to have McGahn deny" the story and create a false record;

• McGahn refused because the story was true and he wouldn't lie, and;

• Trump, in media interviews, denied that he had tried to fire Mueller;

The evidence Mueller examined includes multiple witnesses who testified under oath and contemporaneous notes and records. Mueller looked at all of the evidence and concluded that the weight of the evidence was against Trump. In straight talk that means Mueller concluded Trump was lying.

Look at that! Mueller has evidence to support the first element.

Element 2 is essentially a nexus. To establish the nexus, the prosecution must show that the actions of the suspect — in this case, Trump — would tend to hinder, delay, or prevent communication of information to investigators.

The evidence Mueller examined to determine Element 2 is easily summarized:

• Trump knew the special counsel was investigating obstruction-related events and that the investigation wasn't complete;

• McGahn changing his story would undercut his "credibility as a potential" witness;

• Trump specifically wanted McGahn to produce a written document, and:

• Trump wasn't simply engaging in a media strategy or he would have given an interview denying the story. Instead he specifically asked McGahn to write a letter "for our records" 10 days after the stories ran.

From this, Mueller concluded there were "enough facts" to support the second element as well.

Here is the evidence Mueller used to analyze Element 3:

• Trump "laid the groundwork for pressing McGahn to alter his account" by telling at least one other person that "it might be necessary to fire McGahn if he did not deny the story";

• Trump's statements to McGahn reflect his understanding -- and his displeasure -- that those events (during which he told McGahn "Mueller has to go") would be part of an obstruction-of-justice inquiry.

From this, Mueller asserted that "substantial evidence indicates that in repeatedly urging McGahn to dispute that he was ordered to have the Special Counsel terminated, the President acted for the purpose of influencing McGahn's account in order to deflect or prevent further scrutiny of the President's conduct towards the investigation."

There we have it: evidence to support each element. What Mueller didn't do was draw the conclusion: Trump obstructed justice. He explained why he didn't do that on pages 7-8, Vol. II.

But we didn't really need him to draw the conclusion. Once the analysis part is done, the conclusion is obvious. It's therefore no surprise that on May 6 more than 900 former federal prosecutors signed a letter saying they would have charged "any other person not covered by the Office of Legal Counsel policy against indicting a sitting President" with obstruction on this evidence.

People like Sen. Romney who come to a different conclusion should show the public their analysis, and explain which of the three elements haven't been met and why. It would also be helpful if they explained which particular parts of Mueller's analysis clear Trump and why.

Otherwise, we really have no choice but to conclude that they are telling a politically expedient lie.

This particular lie wouldn't be just any lie. It would be a lie that endangers the Constitution and the republic because elected senators like Mitt Romney are shielding a lawbreaking President.

The Mueller Report explains that obstruction doesn't have to succeed for it to be obstruction. This makes sense, right? If it succeeds, there won't be any charges. Kind of like: Treason never prospers, and what is the reason? If it prospers, none dare call it treason.

It seems Sen. Romney thought he could avoid a constitutional crisis by exonerating the President, as per this tweet:

In fact, Sen. Romney is helping create a constitutional crisis by undermining the document itself.

I have questions for Sen. Romney:

Why do you appear to be lying?

Are you afraid of angering Trump's base, knowing that without Trump's ardent supporters, it will be impossible to put together a national coalition should you run for President?

Are you afraid of Trump?

Or are you afraid of the truth?

Mississippi Coronavirus Cases

Data is updated nightly.

Confirmed Cases: 38567

Reported Deaths: 1290
CountyConfirmedDeaths
Hinds310258
DeSoto205020
Madison156039
Jones125450
Harrison123116
Rankin117320
Forrest107143
Neshoba105077
Lauderdale97581
Scott83715
Jackson80919
Washington78214
Copiah69016
Leake65120
Lee64023
Grenada63412
Oktibbeha63228
Lamar6127
Warren61222
Holmes60842
Wayne57519
Yazoo5747
Leflore56956
Lowndes55317
Lincoln54136
Pike52821
Lafayette5274
Sunflower5269
Monroe47239
Panola4696
Covington4665
Simpson4613
Bolivar42818
Tate41813
Attala39024
Pontotoc3906
Adams38820
Newton37910
Marion35612
Claiborne31811
Pearl River31732
Marshall3074
Winston30513
Chickasaw30419
Jasper2956
Walthall2899
Noxubee2819
Clay26811
Smith26112
Union25811
Coahoma2376
Clarke23425
Lawrence2182
Yalobusha2089
Tallahatchie2064
Montgomery1903
Carroll18911
Kemper18414
Humphreys17810
Calhoun1765
Hancock15813
Itawamba1528
Tippah15111
Jefferson1353
Webster13511
George1313
Jefferson Davis1294
Prentiss1294
Tunica1273
Amite1183
Greene11810
Alcorn1132
Tishomingo1111
Quitman1041
Wilkinson1049
Perry954
Stone802
Choctaw764
Franklin582
Sharkey520
Benton490
Issaquena111
Unassigned00

Alabama Coronavirus Cases

Confirmed Cases: 58225

Reported Deaths: 1183
CountyConfirmedDeaths
Jefferson7186174
Mobile5206147
Montgomery4690114
Tuscaloosa277754
Madison27299
Marshall209012
Shelby182026
Lee171637
Morgan14296
Baldwin139611
Walker112635
DeKalb11187
Etowah110414
Elmore110124
Dallas102810
Franklin96016
Unassigned81428
Russell7340
Autauga73317
Chambers69332
Limestone6914
Cullman6896
Houston6587
Butler65631
St. Clair6463
Tallapoosa64669
Lauderdale6337
Colbert5826
Calhoun5776
Escambia5228
Lowndes49723
Pike4915
Jackson4722
Coffee4534
Covington43913
Talladega4337
Dale4142
Barbour4133
Bullock38010
Hale36723
Marengo36411
Chilton3563
Blount3441
Marion33214
Clarke3296
Wilcox3258
Winston3157
Sumter30413
Pickens2806
Randolph27910
Monroe2773
Perry2632
Conecuh2478
Bibb2322
Macon2279
Choctaw22112
Greene2019
Henry1613
Washington1588
Lawrence1510
Crenshaw1403
Cherokee1357
Geneva1060
Lamar951
Clay922
Fayette902
Coosa691
Cleburne531
Out of AL00
Tupelo
Clear
95° wxIcon
Hi: 95° Lo: 76°
Feels Like: 105°
Columbus
Broken Clouds
86° wxIcon
Hi: 95° Lo: 74°
Feels Like: 94°
Oxford
Scattered Clouds
82° wxIcon
Hi: 92° Lo: 74°
Feels Like: 88°
Starkville
Scattered Clouds
90° wxIcon
Hi: 92° Lo: 71°
Feels Like: 100°
WTVA Radar
WTVA Temperatures
WTVA Severe Weather