Expose Steve Bannon for what he is

To Bannon or not to Bannon? That has been the question on the lips of the literati this summer. Steve Bannon...

Posted: Sep 19, 2018 3:03 PM
Updated: Sep 19, 2018 3:03 PM

To Bannon or not to Bannon? That has been the question on the lips of the literati this summer. Steve Bannon, aesthetic architect of the Donald Trump victory and a key author of his "American carnage" inaugural speech, is now an established political player. But he's also -- as former executive chairman of far-right propaganda website Breitbart News -- one of the godfathers of a white supremacist, illiberal movement which revels in its "deplorable" counterculture status, even as it bolsters populist governments in Hungary, Italy and the United States.

So, does Steve Bannon get a seat at the top table of intelligentsia hangouts, the circuit of "ideas festivals" and magazine conferences? Earlier this month, the New Yorker magazine invited, and then dropped, Bannon as a speaker at its upcoming festival in NYC.

Business and industry sectors

Business, economy and trade

Continents and regions

Discrimination

England

Europe

Festivals

London

Magazines

Media industry

Northern Europe

Political Figures - US

Populism

Publishing industry

Racism and racial discrimination

Societal issues

Society

Steve Bannon

United Kingdom

The proudly open-minded Economist magazine, based in London, promptly announced that it would not be disinviting Bannon from its own "Open Future Festival," which celebrates 175 years as a magazine devoted to "a severe contest between intelligence, which presses forward, and an unworthy, timid ignorance obstructing our progress."

In line with many intellectual organizations which have chosen to engage with chauvinist thinkers, they also wrote: "The future of open societies will not be secured by like-minded people speaking to each other in an echo chamber, but by subjecting ideas and individuals from all sides to rigorous questioning and debate."

Ever the (classically) liberal talking shop, The Economist also published a series of statements on their official website from invited speakers who had chosen to boycott the festival rather than take part, leading to the complete cancellation of the #MeToo panel for lack of speakers.

Exposing Bannon -- or enabling him?

I went along to The Economist's London event last weekend to see whether the magazine's editor-in-chief could live up to her promise to "expose bigotry and prejudice" in interviewing America's racist-in-chief. (The event was held over 24 hours in Hong Kong, London and New York, with video links between each site.)

Zanny Minton-Beddoes is right that one of the great threats to open societies in our generation is the rising censorship of views with which the mob disagrees. If there was a manifesto to the Open Future event, it was the claim -- a correct claim -- that we must engage with our enemies to challenge them.

With such commitment to intellectual diversity, I wondered why the Economist couldn't staff either of its panels on free speech with a contributor from Spiked magazine, a tiny and controversial British outlet. (Full disclosure: I've spoken at Spiked-related events, and half of its people are amongst the brightest and most exciting thinkers you'll meet in the UK. The other half are professional controversialists who make a living defending the positions no one else will defend on TV. Pot luck which you meet.)

Perhaps it illustrates the problem of inviting the likes of Bannon to your event. For better or worse, only the nonconformists are prepared to share a billing. But in the raging culture war between the over-offended left and the out-and-out racist right, our guardians of free speech would do a better job of defending the right to offend if they didn't quite so obviously revel in exercising it.

What of Minton-Beddoes' interview with Bannon himself? Minton-Beddoes is a good interviewer, an experienced journalist deeply versed in policy and principle. She's not wrong to think herself a match for Bannon's brain. Yet these are not compliments Bannon's online followers will allow her. Comments under the YouTube clip of her interview attack her as "emotional," "hectoring," "annoying" . . . and that's just the words I'm allowed to reprint on a family-friendly website. This is par for the course for a woman who dares stand up to Bannon. So, kudos to Minton-Beddoes.

Bannon's followers immediately picked up another word to describe this interviewer: hostile. They're right. Perhaps in response to criticism of her invitation, Minton-Beddoes sought to telegraph her hostility to Bannon at every opportunity.

Take her opening. "You have called us the enemy. You have a very different worldview from us -- which, exactly as I've just explained, is why we asked you to come here." Fair. True. But it is also the perfect way for Bannon to emphasize his own distance from her world of chattering-class conferences.

"What I'd really like to do in the next few minutes is to really try to understand your worldview, your populist nationalism," intoned Beddoes slowly, as if speaking to an incoherent bulldog bat. In a later session, the economist Larry Summers rightly pointed out that the language of "building bridges" with the populist movement, which had dominated the festival's panels, reeked of "the smug complacency of our own superiority -- the idea that 'we' need to build bridges to some alien 'them.' " The global divide in worldview will not be healed by the educated treating public discourse like a charitable outreach project.

Bannon did his thing

As for debate: Bannon did what Bannon does. He talked over Minton-Beddoes; he obfuscated; he downright lied about the aims of his comrade-in-populism, deputy Prime Minister Matteo Salvini of Italy, who wants to compile a registry of the minority Roma people in Italy and not, as Bannon claimed, for their own good. The clips will look great on far-right Twitter accounts, where Bannon's swipe at Jewish members of the Trump administration, Gary Cohn and Steve Mnuchin, will be read for what it is. Minton-Beddoes' own attempts to maintain control of the conversation are already being dismissed by his followers as intrusive.

Yet perhaps this suited The Economist too. If Bannon served a purpose here, it wasn't to be challenged directly. Instead, he was featured as a political bogeyman: only briefly present, looming over everything in his absence.

In London, we watched a video link to Bannon's interview in New York, then switched off the link to enjoy a much superior debate about Bannon chaired by the thoughtful economist Adrian Wooldridge. Here Summers made his excellent point about a discourse based on polarity; here the superb anti-populist writer Yascha Mounk finally managed to point out the violence experienced by ethnic minorities under Bannon's friends in the Italian and Hungarian governments.

Bannon's presence seemed to stimulate one of the best debates on how to defeat populism that I've heard for a long while in a London conference room. We saw four speakers debate different models of realistic nationalism without racism. But there won't be viral videos of it making the rounds on Facebook. Instead, Bannon got what he came for -- a clip of himself "correcting" a patronizing well-educated woman -- and left.

Was his invite necessary to get this debate going? It's not like Bannon is lacking platforms or invites to conferences. He also spoke at the Financial Times' Future of News conference earlier this year. None of the participants invited to respond had been previously unfamiliar with his oeuvre.

Yet perhaps The Economist is right. Perhaps Bannon should be welcome at more high-life conferences. Make sure you get a glass of champagne in his hands; and find a very elite interviewer who'll nonetheless nod adoringly at every word he says. There was great potential to embarrass Bannon here. After all, he has built a brand rejecting "the party of Davos." This wasn't Davos, but it was the next best thing. The Economist paraded him like a slightly malodorous curiosity. They'd have done better to spoil him with kindness.

Mississippi Coronavirus Cases

Data is updated nightly.

Cases: 161516

Reported Deaths: 3916
CountyCasesDeaths
DeSoto10863104
Hinds10705207
Harrison7624114
Jackson6774131
Rankin6303114
Lee557798
Madison5311112
Forrest405587
Jones388589
Lauderdale3754149
Lafayette347358
Washington3421108
Lamar310350
Lowndes265168
Oktibbeha262763
Bolivar254686
Panola243754
Neshoba2333124
Marshall229451
Leflore216492
Monroe216278
Pontotoc213631
Lincoln203267
Sunflower198156
Warren189559
Tate187251
Union179626
Copiah176141
Pike170860
Pearl River168170
Itawamba166637
Scott166030
Yazoo164441
Alcorn161529
Coahoma160044
Prentiss159034
Simpson156954
Grenada149545
Adams148852
Leake146244
George138326
Covington137642
Holmes136861
Tippah135230
Winston134326
Hancock132842
Wayne127424
Attala126836
Marion126548
Tishomingo116444
Newton114929
Chickasaw112632
Tallahatchie101227
Clay98527
Clarke96954
Jasper90023
Stone85115
Calhoun82413
Montgomery80726
Walthall80430
Carroll78115
Lawrence76814
Smith76516
Yalobusha75728
Noxubee74817
Perry70127
Greene66023
Tunica64019
Amite61815
Jefferson Davis60818
Claiborne59716
Humphreys56119
Benton51018
Quitman5107
Kemper50019
Webster49514
Wilkinson42522
Jefferson39012
Franklin3866
Choctaw3757
Sharkey33517
Issaquena1254
Unassigned00

Alabama Coronavirus Cases

Cases: 264199

Reported Deaths: 3831
CountyCasesDeaths
Jefferson35310515
Mobile20626372
Madison14521153
Tuscaloosa13897173
Montgomery12844246
Shelby1127878
Baldwin9501138
Lee807167
Morgan740555
Etowah704870
Marshall695358
Calhoun6939126
Houston559140
DeKalb521843
Cullman490650
St. Clair466557
Limestone462446
Lauderdale452257
Elmore440070
Walker3914112
Talladega386157
Jackson373523
Colbert347948
Blount323146
Autauga294542
Franklin265534
Coffee260023
Dale247355
Dallas236832
Chilton235445
Covington234834
Russell23433
Escambia208832
Tallapoosa192692
Chambers189154
Clarke165422
Pike165215
Marion150236
Winston146325
Lawrence139936
Pickens129720
Geneva12929
Marengo127824
Bibb127038
Barbour121729
Butler121142
Cherokee108224
Randolph108022
Fayette102216
Hale102132
Clay95527
Washington94222
Henry9097
Monroe85311
Lowndes82930
Cleburne80914
Macon77522
Crenshaw73830
Lamar7348
Conecuh73215
Bullock71120
Perry7037
Wilcox65918
Sumter60122
Greene45818
Choctaw43620
Coosa3854
Out of AL00
Unassigned00
Tupelo
Clear
54° wxIcon
Hi: 59° Lo: 33°
Feels Like: 54°
Columbus
Clear
54° wxIcon
Hi: 58° Lo: 32°
Feels Like: 54°
Oxford
Clear
54° wxIcon
Hi: 56° Lo: 33°
Feels Like: 54°
Starkville
Clear
54° wxIcon
Hi: 57° Lo: 32°
Feels Like: 54°
WTVA Radar
WTVA Temperatures
WTVA Severe Weather