The Supreme Court Thursday agreed to freeze, for now,-a lower court opinion that struck down North Carolina congressional districts holding that it amounted to an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander.
The order makes it likely, although not certain,-that the controversial maps will be used for the next election.
Federal court ordered North Carolina to re-draw its congressional districts
Supreme Court action blocks that order, making it likely maps will be used this year
Critics say the maps were intended to favor GOP candidates
Earlier this month, a three judge panel held North Carolina's 2016 plan -- that was passed by a Republican-led legislature was enacted "with the intent of discriminating against voters who favored non-Republican candidates" and that the plan violated the First Amendment by "unjustifiably discriminating against voters based on their previous political expression and affiliation."
The lower court had ordered the North Carolina General Assembly to enact a remedial redistricting plan by January 24 in order to allow the General Assembly two weeks to draw a remedial plan.
The order comes as the Supreme Court is also considering two other partisan gerrymander cases out of Maryland and Wisconsin.
Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor dissented from the court's order.
- Supreme Court blocks court order to redraw North Carolina congressional districts
- PA Supreme Court issues congressional district map
- GOP asks Supreme Court to block new Pennsylvania congressional maps
- Judges order North Carolina congressional districts redrawn quickly
- Supreme Court upholds block on asylum ban
- North Carolina 9th District election dispute grinds through courts
- What's happening in North Carolina's 9th Congressional District
- Supreme Court rejects Pennsylvania GOP plea to block new congressional maps
- URGENT - Supreme Court sends North Carolina partisan gerrymander back to lower court
- Court orders new Pennsylvania congressional district map, says it favored GOP