A divided Supreme Court tonight handed a partial victory to Republican legislators in North Carolina.
The justices granted a request to put on hold state legislative remedial maps in Wake County and Mecklenburg County. Those maps were drawn by a court-appointed special master earlier this year after a lower court held that some of the districts in earlier maps amounted to a racial gerrymander.
The Supreme Court's ruling means that maps drawn by Republicans for those counties in 2017 are likely to be used in the next election.
The ruling is a only a partial victory for the lawmakers, however, because the justices declined a request to put on hold maps for four other districts.
Two justices, conservatives Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas, would have granted the lawmakers a full stay of their request. Two liberals, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor, would have denied the request in its entirety.
Voting rights groups had accused Republicans of "seeking a stay of the district court's remedial order so that they can hang on to the fruits of their racial gerrymander labor for at least one more year. "
- Supreme Court grants North Carolina Republicans partial victory in gerrymander case
- URGENT - Supreme Court sends North Carolina partisan gerrymander back to lower court
- Supreme Court not finding consensus on gerrymandering
- North Carolina gov blasts 'technologically diabolical gerrymandering'
- URGENT - Supreme Court issues ruling in Wisconsin political gerrymandering case
- Three reasons to (cautiously) celebrate Supreme Court on gerrymandering
- 9-0 ruling masks deep division on gerrymandering at Supreme Court
- North Carolina gerrymandering decision creates uncertainty ahead of midterms
- North Carolina's unconstitutional gerrymandered map will be used in midterms
- Pennsylvania Republican wants to impeach judges in gerrymandering case